The other day, I was considering putting something on Twitter rather than my blog. I considered this because what I had to write was pretty short — a sentence or two. But when I thought about it some more, I don’t think length alone should determine whether something should be put on Twitter, or whether it should be put in a blog. What matters is how long you intend the information to be valuable.
Twitter has a function whereby you can see someone’s entire posting history. I suggest that this feature is not used that often, and when it is used, only the first page of someone’s history is usually all that is looked it, so that the user can determine if the other user’s content is worth reading on a day-to-day-basis.
I really only ever look at someone’s Twitter posting history for one reason: To see if they’re someone I want to follow.
I never go through someone’s Twitter history and read old things they’ve wrote. I do, however, occasionally read old blog posts.
Why is this the case on Twitter? I don’t know if it’s the connectedness (e.g. via SMS, IM, etc.), the brevity imposed on messages (Twitter posts must be 140 characters in length or less), or what, but I do believe that Twitter is usually used - and best-used - to communicate things right now, and if they don’t get read by someone, they just float by in the river.
Many of my posts on Twitter (are you going to prove me wrong and read all of them? ;)) are jokes, or references to life events that are going on right now. I believe that the category “References to things happening right now” makes up the majority of posts by people actively participating in Twitter (e.g. know several people on Twitter, and participate in back-and-forth dialog on Twitter).
So, I guess my point is that sometimes you may see small posts on my blog, and if they’re there, it’s because I think they’re worth posterity
Uncategorized, real life, software